Pdf reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score. The eccentric group reported a significant pain reduction. The anklehindfoot, midfoot, metatarsophalangeal mtpinterphalangeal ip for the hallux, and mtpip for the lesser toes. Patientreported outcome pro instruments are used in all medical disciplines to evaluate patients with different diseases and also to follow results after treatments such as surgery.
Construct validity of the faos was assessed by calculation of spearmans correlation coefficients with similar and dissimilar domains of the sf36 health survey, american orthopedic foot and ankle. Clinical rating system for the ankle, hindfoot, midfoot. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score in adult. The foot and ankle outcome score faos is a regionspecific. Therefore, the acfas has designed 4 modules that correspond to major anatomic regions germane to the foot and ankle that together consti. The faos covers 5 dimensions that are reported separately. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score koos was developed as an extension of the womac osteoarthritis index with the purpose of evaluating shortterm and longterm symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. The aim of our study was to validate the faos for assessing outcomes in flexible adult acquired flatfoot deformity aafd. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score koos. The american orthopaedic foot and ankle society aofas clinical rating scale, which is.
The ankle hindfoot, midfoot, metatarsophalangeal mtpinterphalangeal ip for the hallux, and mtpip for the lesser toes. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self. The foot and ankle disability index fadi score and. According to the cross cultural adaptation of selfreport measures guideline, the. Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score. Foot and ankle quarterly is a journal that has 4 issues a year and is published by data trace. Foot and ankle ability measures rehabmeasures database.
The questionnaire is divided into two scales, the foot and ankle core scale, comprised of 20 questions and the shoe comfort scale with five questions. Pdf evaluation of the foot and ankle outcome score in. In addition to the measure specifications above, the foot and ankle functional status fs patientreported outcome measure prom and the foot and ankle risk adjustment coefficients are additional components of this measure. The faos is a 42item instrument to evaluate symptoms and functional limitations related to the foot and ankle. It is validated for lateral ankle instability and hallux valgus patients. The eccentric group reported a significant pain reduction 28% compared to baseline, p0. If the ativity in question is limited by something other than your foot or ankle, write na. This trend may be related to the greater awareness of evidencebased practice and of out. In the foot and ankle literature, a wide range of patientreported outcome measures proms is used, however, consensus as to which proms are preferred is lacking. Several instruments have been developed and validated in clinical samples to assess foot and. This deficiency was recently established at the american orthopaedic foot and ankle societys aofas 2003 and 2005 annual summer meetings.
Outcome scores and surveys socrates includes over 80 outcomes scores and patient surveys. Analysis of faos scores was carried out using students. Originally published in 2001 in foot and ankle international, the foot and ankle outcome score faos is an adaption of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score that assesses patient pain 9 items, other symptoms 7 items, function in daily living 17 items, function in sport and recreation 5 items, and foot ankle related quality of life 4 items. This survey asks for your view about your footankle. Another bly outcome measure for the foot podiatry arena. The prom and coefficients components are available via two options.
The variability of the scoring methods available to investigators underscores the need for a standard, accepted grading method to evaluate various foot and ankle conditions before and after treatments. We would like to ask you for a moment of your time to fill in a short questionnaire, at the end of your visit. Using anchor and distributionbased approaches, the minimally important difference for the pain domain ranged from 5. Creating such a universal selfreport measure would improve researchers and clinicians ability to compare effectiveness of relevant treatments as well as provide a tool with which to. Scores should describe the animal as they are at the time of scoring, without consideration of age. The faam was developed to provide a universal measure of change in physical functioning of patients with leg, ankle, and foot musculoskeletal disorders. The selfreported foot and ankle score sefas is a patientreported outcome measure, while the american orthopedic foot and ankle society score aofas is a clinicianbased score, both used for evaluation of foot and ankle disorders. Pain, other symptoms, function in daily living adl, function in sport and recreation. The foot and ankle outcome score faos is a patientreported questionnaire measuring symptoms and functional limitations of the foot and ankle. One of the most widely used pro measures for foot and ankle conditions is the american orthopedic foot and ankle society score aofas. The purpose of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of these 2 scoring systems. Foot health status questionnaire, podiatry health questionnaire and the bristol foot score.
The aim of this study was to validate the faos in patients with hallux rigidus. The faos appears to be useful for the evaluation of patientrelevant. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for hallux. Developed in 1994, the clinicianbased aofas covers four different regions of the foot. Foot and ankle questionnaire jewett orthopaedic clinic. We studied the validity and reliability of the foot and ankle outcome score faos when used to evaluate the outcome of 2 patients mean age 40 years, 85 females who underwent anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments with an average postoperative followup of 12 years range, three to 24 years. The foot and ankle outcome score faos is an alternative subjective survey, assessing outcomes in 5 subscales. Foot and ankle outcome score faos, english version lk1. A correlation analysis was performed of the atrs with the 2 validated footankleachilles tendon scores, the foot and ankle outcome score faos and the swedish version of the victorian institute of sports assessmentachilles questionnaire visaas. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle. The faos is a 42item questionnaire assessing patient relevant outcomes in five separate subscales pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and.
Guide for authors foot and ankle surgery issn 12687731. The benefit of our conservative therapeutic concept was evaluated by the patients on the basis of vas and faos scoring systems before and after treatment. Scores will be adjusted for age as part of the analysis. The aaos foot and ankle questionnaire is a patientadministrated 25item survey specifically developed for foot and anklerelated disability. A survey of selfreported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle s elfreported outcome instruments, which are used to measure change in health status over time, have become increasingly popular.
The faos is a 42item questionnaire divided into 5 subscales pain 9 items, other. A survey of selfreported outcome instruments for the foot. The foot and ankle disability index fadi score and sports module patient name. Specialist ankle foot hallux toes surgery and treatment in the uk.
The foot and ankle outcome score faos the faos score is calculated from a patientadministrated 42item questionnaire developed for foot and anklerelated disability roos et al. Seven foto functional status measures endorsed by national. This page is about the meanings of the acronymabbreviationshorthand faos in the miscellaneous field in general and in the unclassified terminology in particular. The foot and ankle outcome score faos the faos score is calculated from a patientadministrated 42item questionnaire developed for foot and ankle related disability roos et al. A validated score for foot and ankle outcome is unavailable. Minimally important difference in the foot and ankle. Comparison of the selfreported foot the authors 2014. We evaluated its construct validity in 6 patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle, its. The american orthopedic foot and ankle score aofas pro.
We are always looking for ways to improve customer experience on. Outcome assessment was determined by the foot and ankle outcome score faos and short form 36item health survey sf36, time to radiographic union or fusion, and woundhealing complications at. The subscale pain was correlated with the foot and ankle outcome score faos 5, 19, the subscale work and daily living was correlated with the foot and ankle ability measure faam. Each issue is devoted to one topic and subscribers can use the journal to earn cme via a home study program. If you decide to participate, a new browser tab will open so you can complete the survey after you have completed your visit to this website. Reliability and validity of the dutch version of the foot. From 2007 to 20, 211 patients with hallux rigidus hr were. Currently there is no generally accepted and fully validated pro instrument for the foot and ankle. There is a clear call for improved patientcentered outcomes. A wide variety of outcome measures have been proposed for use in conditions affecting the foot and ankle. Visualization of stress fractures of the foot using pet. All the correlating scores can be used for followup examinations of ankle pathologies and have at least some evidence for score interpretation 11, 14. Free public access to additional components of the foot and ankle propm.
The faos met set criteria of validity and reliability. Kitaoka hb, alexander ij, adelaar rs, nunley ja, myerson ms, sanders m. Please take a few minutes to complete our quick online patient survey for the purpose of assisting us in better serving you and future patients. Postgraduate studies and research program, university of social. Selection of a prom is among other reasons, often based on measurement properties without considering the methodological quality of the studies that evaluate these measurement properties. Dutch version of the victorian institute of sports.
Clinical rating systems for the anklehindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. If the activity in question is limited by something other than your foot or ankle, please mark. To translate the new zealand ankle questionnaire into a swedish version, the selfreported. Aim is to translate and culturally adapt the dutch version of the faos and to investigate internal consistency, validity, repeatability and responsiveness. The foot and ankle outcome score faos was developed as a selfadministered survey instrument to assess the disability of the foot and ankle and associated pathologies, often including ankle instability after severe ankle fractures, achilles tendinosis and plantar fascitis. Heavy domestic duties moving heavy boxes, scrubbing floors, etc none mild moderate severe extreme. The foot and ankle outcome score faos consists of 42 items as effect. Pdf evaluation of the foot and ankle outcome score in patients.
The foot and ankle outcome score faos has been evaluated for many conditions of the foot and ankle. The foot and ankle outcome score faos is a regionspecific patientreported measure that has been validated for a number of foot and ankle diagnoses, but not hallux rigidus. Pain and function were evaluated by a validated mailed survey, the foot and ankle outcome score faos. Measurement properties of the most commonly used foot and. Psychometric properties of the foot and ankle outcome score in a. Faos is a 42item questionnaire divided into five subscales. Foot and ankle ability measure faam activities of daily living subscale please answer every question with one response that most clearly describes your condition within the past week.
1178 1070 661 777 282 1348 1628 618 1018 1430 1489 1450 1085 821 457 1240 568 199 1317 401 943 1084 98 198 934 6 300 628 580 1308 639 724 1047 689 326 717